Flipped from RepublicanCalled Nov 4Unofficial resultsIncumbent defeated

Wisconsin's 3rd District

U.S. House · Wisconsin

Rebecca Cooke flipped the seat for Democrats, winning by 6.6 points over Derrick Van Orden.

Rebecca CookeDemocrat · winner
52.4%172,757
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · incumbent
45.8%150,873
Alexander Valiensi KentIndependent
1.2%4,035
Rustin ProvanceIndependent
0.6%1,799
90% of the expected vote counted · 329,464 votes

Source: civicAPI unofficial results and race callsUpdated Nov 7, 2026, 7:00 PM ET

Where the race moved

Against the 2024 presidential vote

The seat's recent races

EvenR+3.72022 HouseR+2.72024 HouseR+7.52024 Pres.D+6.62026 House

Source: Past results: 99chambers results archive (MEDSL, Klarner, state election offices)

Money in this race

Each line compares the two sides on one scale: their campaigns, and outside groups spending for them or against their opponent.

Rebecca CookeDerrick Van Orden
$12.7M
Raised by the campaign
$9.1M
$12.2M
Spent by the campaign
$8.5M
$447.4K
Cash on hand
$1.2M
$1.8M
Outside spending for them
$2.4M
$13.4M
Outside spending against their opponent
$5.5M
$27.9M
All money helping them
$17.1M

Top funders

Outside groups and direct contributors, ranked by what they put in; the color shows which candidate it helps.

HMPAgainst Orden$8.9M
SAFETY & AFFORDABILITY PAC INC.Against Cooke$4.9M
LCV Victory FundFor Cooke, against Orden$1.9M
AMERICAN MAJORITY ACTION PACFor Orden$1M
TOMORROW TOGETHERAgainst Orden$880.9K
EDF Action VotesAgainst Orden$746.6K
NO GOING BACK PAC INC.For Orden, against Cooke$660.9K
Progressive Turnout ProjectFor Cooke$615.7K
One For All CommitteeFor Cooke$400K
America PACAgainst Cooke$394.6K
EDW Action FundAgainst Orden$299.6K
AMERICA FIRST AGRICULTURE ACTION INC.For Orden$284.9K
For Our FutureFor Cooke$263.6K
Show 5 more

Campaign money: FEC, through Oct 14, 2026. Outside spending: independent expenditures by super PACs, parties and other groups, primary and general, as reported to the FEC through Nov 1, 2026, updated Nov 3, 2026. It leaves out spending not reported as independent expenditures (most issue ads and much dark money), so it understates all outside money. The FEC lists only each candidate's largest spenders; totals count every spender.

Source: FEC campaign filings; FEC independent expendituresUpdated Nov 3, 2026, 1:05 AM ET

Polls against the result

The final average had Cooke ahead by 1.8. Cooke won by 6.6: a 4.8-point miss toward Republicans.

R+5EvenD+5Result D+6.6Final average D+1.8Nov 1Dec 1Jan 1Feb 1Mar 1Apr 1May 1Jun 1Jul 1Aug 1Sep 1Oct 1Nov 3
  • Poll with Cooke ahead
  • Poll with Orden ahead
  • Final polling average
  • Result
PollsterDatesSampleCookeOrdenMarginAdjustedMiss vs resultGradeRelease
FM3 Research for House Majority PACD-sponsoredJun 20–Jun 25535 LV5046D+4D+1.1−2.6Dthehousemajoritypac.com ↗
Impact Research for Rebecca Cooke's campaignD-sponsoredMay 26–May 31500 LV5046D+4D+4.5−2.6Cdrive.google.com ↗
Impact Research for Rebecca Cooke's campaignD-sponsoredFeb 12–Feb 17500 LV4948D+1D+2.2−5.6Cdrive.google.com ↗
Public Policy Polling for House Majority PACD-sponsoredOct 14–Oct 15609 RV4442D+2D+3.9−4.6B+politico.com ↗

Adjusted: after correcting for the pollster's house effect and likely-voter screens. Miss: the poll's margin minus the result; + means the poll leaned Democratic. Grade: the pollster's accuracy in past elections, A+ to D (pollster ratings).

Source: Each poll's release, via The New York Times and Wikipedia poll listsUpdated Jun 25, 2026

Pre-election forecast (final, Nov 3)

Our model's last run before Election Day, Nov 3, 2026. It no longer updates.

Rebecca Cooke
63%
Derrick Van Orden
37%
Projected margin
D+2.0
How the forecast works →

The candidates

Changes to this page

  • · Race called for Cooke.