Horizon · our Election Day forecast: polls, plus fundamentals like incumbency, fundraising and past results.

Pulse · polls only: where the races stand today, with no fundamentals and wider uncertainty.

What's the difference?

Michigan › U.S. House of Representatives · November 3, 2026 · Updated Oct 16, 2026

Michigan's 4th District

Flip risk: Republican-held seat, a toss-up (46% chance it changes parties).

A toss-up: each side wins about half the simulations.

McCann (D)
46%
chance of winning
Huizenga (R)
54%
Average margin
R+0.5
80% of outcomes
R+9 to D+8
Partisan lean
R+5
Polls
4in our database

Flip risk: Republican-held seat, a toss-up (41% chance it changes parties).

A toss-up: each side wins about half the simulations.

McCann (D)
41%
chance of winning
Huizenga (R)
59%
Average margin
R+1.5
80% of outcomes
R+11 to D+8
Partisan lean
R+5
Polls
4in our database

Range of outcomes

Final margin across our simulations; the white dashes mark the middle 80%.

R+0.5R+20R+10EvenD+10D+20
R+1.5R+20R+10EvenD+10D+20

How the odds have moved

Chance of winning by forecast date.

0%25%50%75%100%AugSepOctNovNov 3McCann 46%Huizenga 54%

Updated nightly. Each day is the current model run on the polls that had ended by then (how).

0%25%50%75%100%AugSepOctNovNov 3McCann 41%Huizenga 59%

Updated nightly. Each day is the current model run on the polls that had ended by then (how).

The candidates

Democratic

Sean McCann

State senator from the 19th district (2019–present)

Experience
State legislature
Raised
$4.3M
From individuals
$3.7M
Spent
$3M
Cash on hand
$1.3M

Money: FEC, through Sep 30, 2026.

Profile and career · Wikipedia

RepublicanIncumbent

Bill Huizenga

Incumbent U.S. representative (2011–present)

Experience
Statewide office or Congress
Raised
$5.4M
From individuals
$2.2M
Spent
$3.6M
Cash on hand
$1.9M

Money: FEC, through Sep 30, 2026.

Profile and career · Wikipedia

What goes into the forecast

Every ingredient's estimate of the final margin.

National environment
D+9.5Election Day forecast; federal races run in it
Swing reaching this office
78%Of a shift in the environment, from past House races since 2016
Midwest adjustment
+1.4How House races in the region have run against lean and environment lately
← RepublicanDemocratic →Lean + environmentUsual vote, shifted by 78% of the environment andthe Midwest adjustmentD+3.8Fundamentals modelAdds incumbency, past results, money andexperienceD+2.3Polls in similar placesPolling of similar races in Michigan andlook-alike placesD+2.6Polling average4 polls, latest Sep 16R+4.7Horizon forecastPolls + fundamentals, projected to Election DayR+0.5Pulse forecastPolls (and polling of similar places) only, todayR+1.5

Each estimate is a margin before national and statewide uncertainty is simulated. Horizon blends polls, fundamentals and a little of the similar-places estimate, weighting each by how precise it is; Pulse uses polls and similar places only.

Fundamentals inputs
Incumbency (+1 D, −1 R)-1
Fundraising edge (log ratio of individual money)0.56
Elected-experience edge-0.33
First-term incumbent0
Seat's last result vs. expectation-4.11
Incumbent's last result vs. expectation-4.11

Polls

R+5EvenD+5Avg. R+4.7Nov 21Nov 3
All 4 polls
PollsterDatesSampleMcCannHuizengaMarginAdjusted
GBAO for McCann's campaignD-sponsoredSep 13–Sep 16500 LV4746D+1R+4.7
GBAO for McCann's campaignD-sponsoredMay 28–Jun 1500 LV4845D+3R+2.0
Ragnar Research Partners for Conservatives For America, an organization linked to the Republican Study CommitteeR-sponsoredMar 12–Mar 14400 LV4248R+6D+3.5
Public Policy PollingD-sponsoredNov 20–Nov 21559 RV4244R+2D+0.1

Adjusted: after correcting for the pollster's house effect, registered vs. likely voters, and movement in the national environment since the poll; shown for the polls carrying the most weight in today's average. Larger dots in the chart carry the most weight. Last poll: Sep 16, 2026.

The district

Lean R+5: how much more Democratic or Republican than the nation it votes for president.

Presidential vote

← RepublicanDemocratic →2016 presidentR+10.1R+12.3 vs. nation2020 presidentR+4.0R+8.5 vs. nation2024 presidentR+5.6R+4.1 vs. nation

Precinct results re-aggregated to the current district lines.

Who lives here

Population
776,233
People per km²
77
Adults with a B.A.+
33%
White, no degree
51%of adults
  • White 75%
  • Hispanic 9%
  • Black 8%
  • Asian 3%
  • Other / multiracial 5%

American Community Survey 2020–2024, aggregated from census tracts.

Past results

Results in the same-numbered district; earlier elections may have used different lines.

2024

425,828 votes · R+11.9
✓ Bill Huizenga (R)55.1%
Jessica Swartz (D)43.4%
Curtis Clark (CST)1.6%

2024 President Vote in this district

427,245 two-party votes · R+5.6 · R+4.1 vs. the nation
✓ Donald Trump (R)52.8%
Kamala Harris (D)47.2%

2022

338,471 votes · R+12.3
✓ Bill Huizenga (R)54.3%
Joseph Alfonso (D)42.5%
Lorence Wenke (L)2.5%
Curtis Michael Clark (CST)0.7%

2020 Earlier district lines

373,272 votes · R+33.5
✓ John R Moolenaar (R)65.0%
Jerry Hilliard (D)32.4%
David Canny (L)1.4%
Amy Slepr (G)1.2%

2020 President Vote in this district

409,770 two-party votes · R+4.0 · R+8.5 vs. the nation
✓ Donald Trump (R)52.0%
Joe Biden (D)48.0%

2018 Earlier district lines

285,050 votes · R+25.2
✓ John Moolenaar (R)62.6%
Jerry Hilliard (D)37.4%

2016 Earlier district lines

315,751 votes · R+31.5
✓ John R Moolenaar (R)61.6%
Debra Wirth (D)32.1%
Leonard Schwartz (L)2.7%
George M Zimmer (CST)1.8%
Jordan Salvi (G)1.3%

2016 President Vote in this district

339,032 two-party votes · R+10.1 · R+12.3 vs. the nation
✓ Donald Trump (R)55.0%
Hillary Clinton (D)45.0%