Horizon · our Election Day forecast: polls, plus fundamentals like incumbency, fundraising and past results.

Pulse · polls only: where the races stand today, with no fundamentals and wider uncertainty.

What's the difference?

South Carolina › U.S. House of Representatives · November 3, 2026 · Updated Oct 16, 2026

South Carolina's 1st District

Honeycutt is favored to win: Honeycutt wins in 3 of every 5 simulations.

Lacore (D)
39%
chance of winning
Honeycutt (R)
61%
Average margin
R+1.6
80% of outcomes
R+9 to D+6
Partisan lean
R+12
Polls
5in our database

Flip risk: Republican-held seat, a toss-up (43% chance it changes parties).

A toss-up: each side wins about half the simulations.

Lacore (D)
43%
chance of winning
Honeycutt (R)
57%
Average margin
R+1.2
80% of outcomes
R+10 to D+8
Partisan lean
R+12
Polls
5in our database

Range of outcomes

Final margin across our simulations; the white dashes mark the middle 80%.

R+1.6R+20R+10EvenD+10D+20
R+1.2R+20R+10EvenD+10D+20

How the odds have moved

Chance of winning by forecast date.

0%25%50%75%100%AugSepOctNovNov 3Lacore 39%Honeycutt 61%

Updated nightly. Each day is the current model run on the polls that had ended by then (how).

0%25%50%75%100%AugSepOctNovNov 3Lacore 43%Honeycutt 57%

Updated nightly. Each day is the current model run on the polls that had ended by then (how).

The candidates

Democratic

Nancy Lacore

Former chief of the U.S. Navy Reserve (2024–2025)

Experience
No elected office
Raised
$4.4M
From individuals
$4.2M
Spent
$3.9M
Cash on hand
$552.6K

Money: FEC, through Sep 30, 2026.

Profile and career · Wikipedia

Libertarian

Bill Reeside

Nuclear engineer

Experience
No elected office
Raised
$115.4K
From individuals
$9.9K
Spent
$109.5K
Cash on hand
$5.9K

Money: FEC, through Sep 30, 2026.

Profile and career

What goes into the forecast

Every ingredient's estimate of the final margin.

National environment
D+9.5Election Day forecast; federal races run in it
Swing reaching this office
78%Of a shift in the environment, from past House races since 2016
Southeast adjustment
−1.9How House races in the region have run against lean and environment lately
← RepublicanDemocratic →Lean + environmentUsual vote, shifted by 78% of the environment andthe Southeast adjustmentR+5.5Fundamentals modelAdds incumbency, past results, money andexperienceR+4.3Polls in similar placesPolling of similar races in South Carolina andlook-alike placesR+4.0Polling average4 polls, latest Oct 4D+1.0Horizon forecastPolls + fundamentals, projected to Election DayR+1.6Pulse forecastPolls (and polling of similar places) only, todayR+1.2

Each estimate is a margin before national and statewide uncertainty is simulated. Horizon blends polls, fundamentals and a little of the similar-places estimate, weighting each by how precise it is; Pulse uses polls and similar places only.

Fundamentals inputs
Incumbency (+1 D, −1 R)0
Fundraising edge (log ratio of individual money)-0.34
Elected-experience edge-0.33
First-term incumbent0
Seat's last result vs. expectation-2.29
Incumbent's last result vs. expectation0

Polls

R+5EvenD+5Avg. D+1.0Jul 22Nov 3
All 5 polls
PollsterDatesSampleLacoreHoneycuttMarginAdjusted
GQRD-sponsoredSep 30–Oct 4400 LV4845D+3D+2.1
co/efficient for Thank You For Your Attention To This Matter PAC, which supports HoneycuttR-sponsoredSep 30–Oct 1837 LV4046R+6D+1.0
Public Policy Polling for The Bench, which supports LacoreD-sponsoredSep 9–Sep 10536 RV4041R+1R+4.5
GQR for House Majority PAC, which is focused on electing Democrats to the U.SD-sponsoredJul 15–Jul 22400 LV4850R+2R+6.1
GQR for House Majority PAC, which is focused on electing Democrats to the U.SD-sponsoredJul 15–Jul 22400 LV4143R+2R+6.1

Adjusted: after correcting for the pollster's house effect, registered vs. likely voters, and movement in the national environment since the poll; shown for the polls carrying the most weight in today's average. Larger dots in the chart carry the most weight. Last poll: Oct 4, 2026.

The district

Lean R+12: how much more Democratic or Republican than the nation it votes for president.

Presidential vote

← RepublicanDemocratic →2016 presidentR+15.4R+17.6 vs. nation2020 presidentR+7.6R+12.2 vs. nation2024 presidentR+13.2R+11.7 vs. nation

Precinct results re-aggregated to the current district lines.

Who lives here

Population
754,922
People per km²
82
Adults with a B.A.+
43%
White, no degree
37%of adults
  • White 68%
  • Hispanic 9%
  • Black 18%
  • Asian 2%
  • Other / multiracial 5%

American Community Survey 2020–2024, aggregated from census tracts.

Past results

Results in the same-numbered district; earlier elections may have used different lines.

2024

390,777 votes · R+16.6
✓ Nancy Mace (R)58.2%
Michael B. Moore (D)41.6%

2024 President Vote in this district

391,140 two-party votes · R+13.2 · R+11.7 vs. the nation
✓ Donald Trump (R)56.6%
Kamala Harris (D)43.4%

2022

273,466 votes · R+14.1
✓ Nancy Mace (R)56.4%
Annie Andrews (D)42.5%
Joseph Oddo (OTH)1.0%

2020 Earlier district lines

427,111 votes · R+1.3
✓ Nancy Mace (R)50.6%
Joe Cunningham (D)49.3%

2020 President Vote in this district

421,198 two-party votes · R+7.6 · R+12.2 vs. the nation
✓ Donald Trump (R)53.8%
Joe Biden (D)46.2%

2018 Earlier district lines

287,433 votes · D+1.4
✓ Joe Cunningham (D)50.6%
Katie Arrington (R)49.2%

2016 Earlier district lines

325,170 votes · R+22.8
✓ Mark Sanford (R)58.6%
Dimitri Cherny (D)36.8%
Michael Grier Jr (L)3.6%
Albert Travison (OTH)0.9%

2016 President Vote in this district

362,669 two-party votes · R+15.4 · R+17.6 vs. the nation
✓ Donald Trump (R)57.7%
Hillary Clinton (D)42.3%